Edwardian 18ct Gold 5 Stone Sapphire Ring

Edwardian 18ct Gold 5 Stone Sapphire Ring

Marsoni

M251S

$1458.97

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

Edwardian 18ct Gold 5 Stone Sapphire RingA striking five stone sapphire ring. This beautiful ring is set with bright blue sapphires that have been assessed as natural with no evidence of heat treatment. Circa 1910. No hallmarks tests as 18ct gold. UK size N 1 2 US size 6 3 4 4. 3 grams. The sapphires have a rich colour that is well matched across all the stones. The ring spans 2. 1cm across the finger and is 6mm from top to bottom at the widest point. Nice clean condition. Some of the small

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your Edwardian 18ct Gold 5 Stone Sapphire Ring orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your Edwardian 18ct Gold 5 Stone Sapphire Ring ships.

Need Help?
Questions about Edwardian 18ct Gold 5 Stone Sapphire Ring, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for Edwardian 18ct Gold 5 Stone Sapphire Ring in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

Worn it twice and I find it very comfortable. I wear it outside and casually to protect my arms and neck from the sun and find it more comfortable than a long sleeve t-shirt. The price is comparable. If I was to wear it to the office it would have to be ironed. I bought one shirt to try it and I will be buying more.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on May 8, 2026

Verified Purchase

madison

Cuba, US

★★★★★ 5

nice quality

Fit Type: Regular Fit, Color: White, Size: Small

nice quality shirt. bought this just so i had at least one nice white button down and it's great. fits well and is a nice white color.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on April 11, 2026

Verified Purchase

Anthony Carabello

West Palm Beach, US

★★★★★ 4

Nice shirt!

Fit Type: Regular Fit, Color: White, Size: X-Large

I added one of these shirts to another order just to see if they were any good. I was pleasantly surprised by the quality. It fits perfectly and looks pretty nice for a low cost casual dress shirt. Materials seem decent quality. Comfortable, soft fabric. Didn’t shrink too much in the washer and dryer. We’ll see how it holds up long term but so far so good

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on November 12, 2025

Verified Purchase

Silvia & Marcus

Battle Creek, US

★★★★★ 5

My new favorite shirts!

Fit Type: Regular Fit, Color: Grey, Size: Large

These are my new favorite shirts! I just ordered a 3rd. i wish there were more colors. Yes, the cotton is heavy-weight and I like that. They are just a bit warmer than regular dress shirts. The fit is excellent. I'm 5'9", 200lbs and L fits perfectly. Enough room without being blousy. The sleeves are long enough (finally!). (Most other 16.5/32-33 shirts always have sleeves that are too short). The fit/finish and detail is surprisingly good. They don't really shrink after washing and come out very soft. Not wrinkle-free, but that's ok since it means that the 100% cotton hasn't been dosed with chemicals. I expect they will wear very well over time.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on May 5, 2025

Verified Purchase

Jerry

Pawtucket, US

★★★★★ 5

A perfect white work shirt.

Fit Type: Regular Fit, Color: White, Size: Medium

Thick, durable, iron exquisitely and the fit is spot on. Perfect white work shirt. I have a grey shirt too, the quality is the same.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on March 4, 2026